Clergyman's

Over 1.5 Million "Quote" Cards

Categories

Freedom lies beneath reality.
- Anastacia

SAVE:

DESIGN:

CUSTOM BG: DIM:

FONT:

RATIO:

RES:

BG

PAT

TEXT

FRAME

Freedom lies beneath reality.
- Anastacia

Related Proverbs

Jesus is the light of the world. His light shines through all darkness. His love heals all hatred. His grace and mercy forgives all sins. The anointing of his blood heals the sick and the lame. His guarding angels will forever protect you and his word will forever guide you.
— Colishia S. Benjamin

SAVE:

DESIGN:

CUSTOM BG: DIM:

FONT:

RATIO:

RES:

BG

PAT

TEXT

FRAME

Jesus is the light of the world. His light shines through all darkness. His love heals all hatred. His grace and mercy forgives all sins. The anointing of his blood heals the sick and the lame. His guarding angels will forever protect you and his word will forever guide you.
— Colishia S. Benjamin

The second point to be considered is the method adopted by Spinoza for setting forth his philosophy; it is the demonstrative method of geometry as employed by Euclid, in which we find definitions, explanations, axioms, and theorems. Even Descartes made it his starting-point that philosophic propositions must be mathematically handled and proved, that they must have the very same evidence as mathematics. The mathematical method is considered superior to all others, on account of the nature of its evidence; and it is natural that independent knowledge in its re-awakening lighted first upon this form, of which it saw so brilliant an example. The mathematical method is, however, ill-adapted for speculative content, and finds its proper place only in the finite sciences of the understanding. In modern times Jacobi has asserted that all demonstration, all scientific knowledge leads back to Spinozism, which alone is a logical method of thought; and because it must lead thither, it is really of no service whatever, but immediate knowledge is what we must depend on. It may be conceded to Jacobi that the method of demonstration leads to Spinozism, if we understand thereby merely the method of knowledge belonging to the understanding. But the fact is that Spinoza is made a testing-point in modern philosophy, so that it may really be said: You are either a Spinozist or not a philosopher at all. This being so, the mathematical and demonstrative method of Spinoza would seem to be only a defect in the external form; but it is the fundamental defect of the whole position. In this method the nature of philosophic knowledge and the object thereof, are entirely misconceived, for mathematical knowledge and method are merely formal in character and consequently altogether unsuited for philosophy. Mathematical knowledge exhibits its proof on the existent object as such, not on the object as conceived; the Notion is lacking throughout; the content of Philosophy, however, is simply the Notion and that which is comprehended by the Notion. Therefore this Notion as the knowledge of the essence is simply one assumed, which falls within the philosophic subject; and this is what represents itself to be the method peculiar to Spinoza's philosophy.
- Baruch Spinoza

SAVE:

DESIGN:

CUSTOM BG: DIM:

FONT:

RATIO:

RES:

BG

PAT

TEXT

FRAME

The second point to be considered is the method adopted by Spinoza for setting forth his philosophy; it is the demonstrative method of geometry as employed by Euclid, in which we find definitions, explanations, axioms, and theorems. Even Descartes made it his starting-point that philosophic propositions must be mathematically handled and proved, that they must have the very same evidence as mathematics. The mathematical method is considered superior to all others, on account of the nature of its evidence; and it is natural that independent knowledge in its re-awakening lighted first upon this form, of which it saw so brilliant an example. The mathematical method is, however, ill-adapted for speculative content, and finds its proper place only in the finite sciences of the understanding. In modern times Jacobi has asserted that all demonstration, all scientific knowledge leads back to Spinozism, which alone is a logical method of thought; and because it must lead thither, it is really of no service whatever, but immediate knowledge is what we must depend on. It may be conceded to Jacobi that the method of demonstration leads to Spinozism, if we understand thereby merely the method of knowledge belonging to the understanding. But the fact is that Spinoza is made a testing-point in modern philosophy, so that it may really be said: You are either a Spinozist or not a philosopher at all. This being so, the mathematical and demonstrative method of Spinoza would seem to be only a defect in the external form; but it is the fundamental defect of the whole position. In this method the nature of philosophic knowledge and the object thereof, are entirely misconceived, for mathematical knowledge and method are merely formal in character and consequently altogether unsuited for philosophy. Mathematical knowledge exhibits its proof on the existent object as such, not on the object as conceived; the Notion is lacking throughout; the content of Philosophy, however, is simply the Notion and that which is comprehended by the Notion. Therefore this Notion as the knowledge of the essence is simply one assumed, which falls within the philosophic subject; and this is what represents itself to be the method peculiar to Spinoza's philosophy.
- Baruch Spinoza

The natural balance of the constitution is this—that the Crown should appoint its ministers, that those ministers should have the confidence of the House of Commons, and that the House of Commons should represent the sense and wishes of the people. Such was the machinery of our government; and if any wheel of it went wrong, it deranged the whole system. Thus, when the Stuarts were on the throne, and their ministers did not enjoy the confidence of the House of Commons, the consequence was tumult, insurrection, and civil war throughout the country. At the present period, the ministers of the Crown possess the confidence of the House of Commons, but the House of Commons does not possess the esteem and reverence of the people. The consequences to the country are equally fatal. We have seen discontent breaking into outrage in various quarters—we have seen every excess of popular frenzy committed and defended—we have seen alarm universally prevailing among the upper classes, and disaffection among the lower—we have seen the ministers of the Crown seek a remedy for these evils in a system of severe coercion—in restrictive laws—in large standing armies—in enormous barracks, and in every other resource that belongs to a government which is not founded on the hearts of its subjects.
- "John Russell, 1st Earl Russell"

SAVE:

DESIGN:

CUSTOM BG: DIM:

FONT:

RATIO:

RES:

BG

PAT

TEXT

FRAME

The natural balance of the constitution is this—that the Crown should appoint its ministers, that those ministers should have the confidence of the House of Commons, and that the House of Commons should represent the sense and wishes of the people. Such was the machinery of our government; and if any wheel of it went wrong, it deranged the whole system. Thus, when the Stuarts were on the throne, and their ministers did not enjoy the confidence of the House of Commons, the consequence was tumult, insurrection, and civil war throughout the country. At the present period, the ministers of the Crown possess the confidence of the House of Commons, but the House of Commons does not possess the esteem and reverence of the people. The consequences to the country are equally fatal. We have seen discontent breaking into outrage in various quarters—we have seen every excess of popular frenzy committed and defended—we have seen alarm universally prevailing among the upper classes, and disaffection among the lower—we have seen the ministers of the Crown seek a remedy for these evils in a system of severe coercion—in restrictive laws—in large standing armies—in enormous barracks, and in every other resource that belongs to a government which is not founded on the hearts of its subjects.
- "John Russell, 1st Earl Russell"

My name is Alexandria Villaseñor. I’m 14 years old. I’m from New York. And I am here because 30 years ago the world signed a contract between generations that the present world would leave a world worth inheriting to the future. And today I want to tell the world, you are defaulting on that contract, and we’re here to collect.
- Alexandria Villaseñor

SAVE:

DESIGN:

CUSTOM BG: DIM:

FONT:

RATIO:

RES:

BG

PAT

TEXT

FRAME

My name is Alexandria Villaseñor. I’m 14 years old. I’m from New York. And I am here because 30 years ago the world signed a contract between generations that the present world would leave a world worth inheriting to the future. And today I want to tell the world, you are defaulting on that contract, and we’re here to collect.
- Alexandria Villaseñor

Abhijit Naskar (1125) Abraham Lincoln (1397) Albanian (1935) Albert Camus (1800) Albert Einstein (2916) Ambrose Bierce (1138) Anonymous (1505) Arthur Schopenhauer (1753) Barack Obama (2150) Bertrand Russell (1559) Billy Graham (1992) Bob Dylan (1085) Bryant McGill (1170) Bulgarian (13181) C. S. Lewis (1431) Cassandra Clare (1183) Catalan (3784) Charles Bukowski (1237) Croatian (16737) Czech (22963) Dada Bhagwan (1148) Danish (2386) Debasish Mridha (6601) Deyth Banger (1252) Donald Trump (2337) Dutch (3918) Emil Cioran (1903) English (371280) Estonian (35089) Finnish (15865) Francois de La Rochefoucauld (1321) French (20723) Friedrich Nietzsche (3272) George Bernard Shaw (1713) George Orwell (1486) George W. Bush (1377) German (22924) Greek (5356) Haruki Murakami (1128) Hebrew (68733) Henry David Thoreau (1468) Hindi (2311) Honore de Balzac (1193) Hungarian (11817) Immanuel Kant (1270) Indonesian (4748) Israelmore Ayivor (2078) Italian (207069) Jair Bolsonaro (2066) Japanese (6304) Jean-Paul Sartre (1139) Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1778) Jr. (1549) Karl Marx (1258) Korean (13816) Lailah Gifty Akita (10641) Leonardo da Vinci (1404) Letitia Elizabeth Landon (1129) Lithuanian (18580) Macedonian (3047) Mahatma Gandhi (1250) Mark Twain (2355) Martin Luther King (1127) Matshona Dhliwayo (2260) Mehmet Murat ildan (1972) Michel de Montaigne (1193) Norwegian (5812) Oscar Wilde (3916) Paulo Coelho (1558) Persian (40551) Polish (163509) Portuguese (35683) Ralph Waldo Emerson (2100) Richelle E. Goodrich (1109) Romanian (4430) Russian (57218) Samuel Johnson (1157) Shannon L. Alder (1096) Slovak (8086) Slovenian (2754) Spanish (35704) Stephen King (2052) Steve Maraboli (1239) Sunday Adelaja (5891) Swedish (4650) Tamil (2436) Telugu (1714) Terry Pratchett (1280) Thai (1144) Thomas Jefferson (1117) Turkish (54649) Ukrainian (19016) Unknown (6706) Victor Hugo (1134) Vietnamese (2562) Voltaire (1625) William Shakespeare (2517) Winston Churchill (1647) Woody Allen (1334) سید محمد خاتمی (1960)

© 2026 Clergyman's . All Rights Reserved.