Clergyman's

Over 1.5 Million "Quote" Cards

If heretics no longer horrify us today, as they once did our forefathers, is it certain that it is because there is more charity in our hearts? Or would it not too often be, perhaps, without our daring to say so, because the bone of contention, that is to say, the very substance of our faith, no longer interests us? Men of too familiar and too passive a faith, perhaps for us dogmas are no longer the Mystery on which we live, the Mystery which is to be accomplished in us. Consequently then, heresy no longer shocks us; at least, it no longer convulses us like something trying to tear the soul of our souls away from us.... And that is why we have no trouble in being kind to heretics, and no repugnance in rubbing shoulders with them.
In reality, bias against ‘heretics’ is felt today just as it used to be. Many give way to it as much as their forefathers used to do. Only, they have turned it against political adversaries. Those are the only ones with whom they refuse to mix. Sectarianism has only changed its object and taken other forms, because the vital interest has shifted. Should we dare to say that this shifting is progress?
It is not always charity, alas, which has grown greater, or which has become more enlightened: it is often faith, the taste for the things of eternity, which has grown less. Injustice and violence are still reigning; but they are now in the service of degraded passions.
- Henri de Lubac

SAVE:
DESIGN:
CUSTOM BG:
FONT:
RATIO:
RES:
BG
PAT
TEXT
FRAME

If heretics no longer horrify us today, as they once did our forefathers, is it certain that it is because there is more charity in our hearts? Or would it not too often be, perhaps, without our daring to say so, because the bone of contention, that is to say, the very substance of our faith, no longer interests us? Men of too familiar and too passive a faith, perhaps for us dogmas are no longer the Mystery on which we live, the Mystery which is to be accomplished in us. Consequently then, heresy no longer shocks us; at least, it no longer convulses us like something trying to tear the soul of our souls away from us.... And that is why we have no trouble in being kind to heretics, and no repugnance in rubbing shoulders with them.
In reality, bias against ‘heretics’ is felt today just as it used to be. Many give way to it as much as their forefathers used to do. Only, they have turned it against political adversaries. Those are the only ones with whom they refuse to mix. Sectarianism has only changed its object and taken other forms, because the vital interest has shifted. Should we dare to say that this shifting is progress?
It is not always charity, alas, which has grown greater, or which has become more enlightened: it is often faith, the taste for the things of eternity, which has grown less. Injustice and violence are still reigning; but they are now in the service of degraded passions.
- Henri de Lubac

If heretics no longer horrify us today, as they once did our forefathers, is it certain that it is because there is more charity in our hearts? Or would it not too often be, perhaps, without our daring to say so, because the bone of contention, that is to say, the very substance of our faith, no longer interests us? Men of too familiar and too passive a faith, perhaps for us dogmas are no longer the Mystery on which we live, the Mystery which is to be accomplished in us. Consequently then, heresy no longer shocks us; at least, it no longer convulses us like something trying to tear the soul of our souls away from us.... And that is why we have no trouble in being kind to heretics, and no repugnance in rubbing shoulders with them.
In reality, bias against ‘heretics’ is felt today just as it used to be. Many give way to it as much as their forefathers used to do. Only, they have turned it against political adversaries. Those are the only ones with whom they refuse to mix. Sectarianism has only changed its object and taken other forms, because the vital interest has shifted. Should we dare to say that this shifting is progress?
It is not always charity, alas, which has grown greater, or which has become more enlightened: it is often faith, the taste for the things of eternity, which has grown less. Injustice and violence are still reigning; but they are now in the service of degraded passions.
- Henri de Lubac

SAVE:
DESIGN:
CUSTOM BG:
FONT:
RATIO:
RES:
BG
PAT
TEXT
FRAME

If heretics no longer horrify us today, as they once did our forefathers, is it certain that it is because there is more charity in our hearts? Or would it not too often be, perhaps, without our daring to say so, because the bone of contention, that is to say, the very substance of our faith, no longer interests us? Men of too familiar and too passive a faith, perhaps for us dogmas are no longer the Mystery on which we live, the Mystery which is to be accomplished in us. Consequently then, heresy no longer shocks us; at least, it no longer convulses us like something trying to tear the soul of our souls away from us.... And that is why we have no trouble in being kind to heretics, and no repugnance in rubbing shoulders with them.
In reality, bias against ‘heretics’ is felt today just as it used to be. Many give way to it as much as their forefathers used to do. Only, they have turned it against political adversaries. Those are the only ones with whom they refuse to mix. Sectarianism has only changed its object and taken other forms, because the vital interest has shifted. Should we dare to say that this shifting is progress?
It is not always charity, alas, which has grown greater, or which has become more enlightened: it is often faith, the taste for the things of eternity, which has grown less. Injustice and violence are still reigning; but they are now in the service of degraded passions.
- Henri de Lubac

Navika i rutina imaju nevjerojatnu moć uništavanja i razaranja.
- Henri de Lubac

SAVE:
DESIGN:
CUSTOM BG:
FONT:
RATIO:
RES:
BG
PAT
TEXT
FRAME

Navika i rutina imaju nevjerojatnu moć uništavanja i razaranja.
- Henri de Lubac

Zvyk a rutina má neuvěřitelnou sílu plýtvat a ničit.
- Henri de Lubac

SAVE:
DESIGN:
CUSTOM BG:
FONT:
RATIO:
RES:
BG
PAT
TEXT
FRAME

Zvyk a rutina má neuvěřitelnou sílu plýtvat a ničit.
- Henri de Lubac

Abhijit Naskar (1125) Abraham Lincoln (1397) Albanian (1935) Albert Camus (1800) Albert Einstein (2916) Ambrose Bierce (1138) Anonymous (1505) Arthur Schopenhauer (1753) Barack Obama (2150) Bertrand Russell (1559) Billy Graham (1992) Bob Dylan (1085) Bryant McGill (1170) Bulgarian (13181) C. S. Lewis (1431) Cassandra Clare (1183) Catalan (3784) Charles Bukowski (1237) Croatian (16737) Czech (22963) Dada Bhagwan (1148) Danish (2386) Debasish Mridha (6601) Deyth Banger (1252) Donald Trump (2337) Dutch (3918) Emil Cioran (1903) English (371280) Estonian (35089) Finnish (15865) Francois de La Rochefoucauld (1321) French (20723) Friedrich Nietzsche (3272) George Bernard Shaw (1713) George Orwell (1486) George W. Bush (1377) German (22924) Greek (5356) Haruki Murakami (1128) Hebrew (68733) Henry David Thoreau (1468) Hindi (2311) Honore de Balzac (1193) Hungarian (11817) Immanuel Kant (1270) Indonesian (4748) Israelmore Ayivor (2078) Italian (207069) Jair Bolsonaro (2066) Japanese (6304) Jean-Paul Sartre (1139) Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1778) Jr. (1549) Karl Marx (1258) Korean (13816) Lailah Gifty Akita (10641) Leonardo da Vinci (1404) Letitia Elizabeth Landon (1129) Lithuanian (18580) Macedonian (3047) Mahatma Gandhi (1250) Mark Twain (2355) Martin Luther King (1127) Matshona Dhliwayo (2260) Mehmet Murat ildan (1972) Michel de Montaigne (1193) Norwegian (5812) Oscar Wilde (3916) Paulo Coelho (1558) Persian (40551) Polish (163509) Portuguese (35683) Ralph Waldo Emerson (2100) Richelle E. Goodrich (1109) Romanian (4430) Russian (57218) Samuel Johnson (1157) Shannon L. Alder (1096) Slovak (8086) Slovenian (2754) Spanish (35704) Stephen King (2052) Steve Maraboli (1239) Sunday Adelaja (5891) Swedish (4650) Tamil (2436) Telugu (1714) Terry Pratchett (1280) Thai (1144) Thomas Jefferson (1117) Turkish (54649) Ukrainian (19016) Unknown (6706) Victor Hugo (1134) Vietnamese (2562) Voltaire (1625) William Shakespeare (2517) Winston Churchill (1647) Woody Allen (1334) سید محمد خاتمی (1960)